<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broadcasting 2.0 &#187; HBB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broadcasting20.org/tag/hbb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org</link>
	<description>Emerging technologies for one-to-many telecommunications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ads worth more on the net than on TV</title>
		<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/30/ads-worth-more-on-the-net-than-on-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/30/ads-worth-more-on-the-net-than-on-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networked media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/30/ads-worth-more-on-the-net-than-on-tv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC world reports that for the first time, advertising during a specific &#8220;TV&#8221; show will cost more on the net than on traditional TV channel: If a company wants to run ads alongside an episode of The Simpsons on Hulu or TV.com it will cost the advertiser about $60 per thousand viewers, according to Bloomberg. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/167344">PC world</a> reports that for the first time, advertising during a specific &#8220;TV&#8221; show will cost more on the net than on traditional TV channel:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If a company wants to run ads alongside an episode of The Simpsons on <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/166104/hulu_may_begin_charging_for_content.html?tk=rel_news" target="_blank">Hulu</a> or <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/160350/cbs_releases_tvcom_iphone_app.html?tk=rel_news" target="_blank">TV.com</a> it will cost the advertiser about $60 per thousand viewers, according to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=atKGiQOMco.Y" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a>. On prime-time TV that same ad will cost somewhere between $20 and $40 per thousand viewers.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/30/ads-worth-more-on-the-net-than-on-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

