<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broadcasting 2.0 &#187; 2009 &#187; June</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org</link>
	<description>Emerging technologies for one-to-many telecommunications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ads worth more on the net than on TV</title>
		<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/30/ads-worth-more-on-the-net-than-on-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/30/ads-worth-more-on-the-net-than-on-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networked media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/30/ads-worth-more-on-the-net-than-on-tv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC world reports that for the first time, advertising during a specific &#8220;TV&#8221; show will cost more on the net than on traditional TV channel:

If a company wants to run ads alongside an episode of The Simpsons on Hulu or TV.com it will cost the advertiser about $60 per thousand viewers, according to Bloomberg. On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/167344">PC world</a> reports that for the first time, advertising during a specific &#8220;TV&#8221; show will cost more on the net than on traditional TV channel:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If a company wants to run ads alongside an episode of The Simpsons on <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/166104/hulu_may_begin_charging_for_content.html?tk=rel_news" target="_blank">Hulu</a> or <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/160350/cbs_releases_tvcom_iphone_app.html?tk=rel_news" target="_blank">TV.com</a> it will cost the advertiser about $60 per thousand viewers, according to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=atKGiQOMco.Y" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a>. On prime-time TV that same ad will cost somewhere between $20 and $40 per thousand viewers.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/30/ads-worth-more-on-the-net-than-on-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FemtoDAB</title>
		<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/24/femtodab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/24/femtodab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FemtoDAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/24/femtodab/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to this article, Vodafone will be next week the first mobile network operator to launch a femtocell product in Europe:

&#8220;Looking like a home router, femtocells give 3G coverage indoors, and use home broadband to connect calls across the Internet to the mobile network.&#8221;
&#8220;&#8230; will be available on different price plans&#8230; Essentially, the femto is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/vodafone-launches-home-3g-femtocell-in-the-uk-1203">this article</a>, Vodafone will be next week the first mobile network operator to launch a femtocell product in Europe:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Looking like a home router, femtocells give 3G coverage indoors, and use home broadband to connect calls across the Internet to the mobile network.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; will be available on different price plans&#8230; Essentially, the femto is free to anyone on a £30 contract, and £5 otherwise &#8211; including dongle customers&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Femtocells are in fact compact devices (similar to Wi-Fi routers) that act as very low power cell phone base stations that can be installed in end-users premises. Typical cell phones can connect to them instead of the remote &#8220;high-power&#8221; towers operated by mobile network operators. Femtocells carry the usual communication services through standard Internet connections in homes and offices.</p>
<p>Key benefits to operators (O) and users (U):</p>
<ul>
<li>Better in-building coverage (O, U)</li>
<li>Overall network infrastructure can eventually be operated at lower power levels (O)</li>
<li>Off-loading cellular networks (O)</li>
<li>MNOs can still charge service costs while using end-users resources (Internet) (O)</li>
<li>Use the mobile device at home at lower rates (U)</li>
<li>Does not need regular phone service at home anymore (O, U)</li>
</ul>
<p>Could this femtocell approach be exploited in the context of digital broadcasting as well? At CRC, we have developed a <a href="http://mmbtools.crc.ca/">compact software transmitter for DAB</a>. This platform could be further integrated as a low-cost personal DAB transmitter or FemtoDAB cell!</p>
<p>Such a FemtoDAB approach could offer interesting benefits:</p>
<ul>
<li>Better in-building coverage (O, U)</li>
<li>Overall network infrastructure can eventually be operated at lower power levels (O)</li>
<li>Outdoor, indoor roaming with the same device (broadcast enabled handhelds) (U)</li>
<li>Transmission of additional Internet radio content in the femtoDAB cell (U)</li>
</ul>
<p>One of the challenges will be to make FemtoDAB more attractive than the Wi-Fi options.</p>
<p>Do you see any use cases for FemtoDAB?</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/24/femtodab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In-car Wi-Fi Internet Radio</title>
		<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/24/in-car-wi-fi-internet-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/24/in-car-wi-fi-internet-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networked media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/24/in-car-wi-fi-internet-radio/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Internet radio appliances are becoming available, there is still the issue that they can&#8217;t be used in your car.
This could change thanks to so-called &#8220;in-car WiFi routers&#8221; which are designed to provide Internet access through 3G mobile telephony networks.
AutoNet Mobile offers such device and service combination:

we create a Wi-Fi hot spot that allows everyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Internet radio appliances are becoming available, there is still the issue that they can&#8217;t be used in your car.</p>
<p>This could change thanks to so-called &#8220;in-car WiFi routers&#8221; which are designed to provide Internet access through 3G mobile telephony networks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autonetmobile.com/">AutoNet Mobile</a> offers such device and service combination:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>we create a Wi-Fi hot spot that allows everyone in the car to connect multiple devices to the internet, in and around the car! it’s the next step in in-car entertainment and productvity. we make internet in your car easier than ever because we provide both the in-car router and the monthly service. our affordable monthly service plans start at only $29 per month.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This still represent an expensive proposition for radio though. One hour daily consumption of good quality Internet radio content could easily reach the 29$ 1Gb limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2009/06/24/in-car-wi-fi-internet-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
