<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broadcasting 2.0 &#187; 2005 &#187; December &#187; 20</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org</link>
	<description>Emerging technologies for one-to-many telecommunications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm IP</title>
		<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/qualcomm-ip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/qualcomm-ip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 02:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/qualcomm-ip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And as I was browsing&#160;through The Register, I found this story about the big picture of IP ownership in the mobile wireless world. It looks like patents are moving from one hand to the other in a perpetual fight. &#160; Link]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>And as I was browsing&nbsp;through The Register, I found this story about the big picture of IP ownership in the mobile wireless world. It looks like patents are moving from one hand to the other in a perpetual fight.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/15/qualcomm_ip_battle/">Link</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/qualcomm-ip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile WiMAX Standard Finalized</title>
		<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/mobile-wimax-standard-finalized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/mobile-wimax-standard-finalized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 02:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/mobile-wimax-standard-finalized/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a little bit late on the news but I just noticed that the IEEE 802.16e has been finalized two weeks ago. As Om Malik puts it, that was the easiest part: &#160; &#8230; now companies have to get onboard with the concept, start developing silicon and equipment. But more than that, money has to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I&#8217;m a little bit late on the news but I just noticed that the IEEE 802.16e has been finalized two weeks ago. As <a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/12/07/mobile-wimax-standard-approved/">Om Malik</a> puts it, that was the easiest part:</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><div>&#8230; now companies have to get onboard with the concept, start developing   silicon and equipment. But more than that, money has to be found, to   essentially (and eventually) replicate the cellular mobile infrastructure. It   is going to be a very costly and long drawn out process. It might be easy to   get caught in the euphoria surrounding the news, but we all need to take a   deep breath and get prepared for a long haul.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>  &nbsp;</div>
<div>The Register&nbsp;has a&nbsp;<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/08/ieee_approves_mobile_wimax/">short story</a>&nbsp;about this announcement.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>I have not had the time to look into the specification but WiMAX could be seen as a threat to mobile broadcasting systems such as DMB, DVB-H or MediaFLO. And since WiMAX&#8217;s mother tongue&nbsp;is &#8220;Internet&#8221;, &nbsp;it could be&nbsp;seen as the long awaited and&nbsp;open platform for disruptive mobile applications. Broadcasting 2.0 believers will have to dig into WiMAX broadcasting capabilities.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><a href="http://ieee802.org/16/arc/802-16list2/msg03069.html">Link</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/mobile-wimax-standard-finalized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>links for 2005-12-20</title>
		<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/links-for-2005-12-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/links-for-2005-12-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>delus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/links-for-2005-12-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firewheel Design &#124; Four Concentric Circles of a Web 2.0 Name Great tips for WEB 2.0 branding. I would have loved it 3 weeks ago as I started my new blog! (tags: web2.0 branding names)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="delicious">
<li>
<div class="delicious-link"><a href="http://www.firewheeldesign.com/sparkplug/2005/December/four_concentric_circles_of_a_web_20_name.php">Firewheel Design | Four Concentric Circles of a Web 2.0 Name</a></div>
<div class="delicious-extended">Great tips for WEB 2.0 branding. I would have loved it 3 weeks ago as I started my new blog!</div>
<div class="delicious-tags">(tags: <a href="http://del.icio.us/fralef/web2.0">web2.0</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/fralef/branding">branding</a> <a href="http://del.icio.us/fralef/names">names</a>)</div>
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/links-for-2005-12-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A very compact DMB receiver</title>
		<link>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/a-very-compact-dmb-receiver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/a-very-compact-dmb-receiver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/a-very-compact-dmb-receiver/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung has just announced&#160;its new&#160;tiny DMB phone&#160;model number SCH-B360 / SPH-B3600 / SPH-B3650. Everyday we&#8217;re getting closer to mobile TV applications. It&#8217;s still not clear to me how important our&#160;needs for&#160;real-time video streams on-the-move are. But TV was never mobile. It&#8217;s certainly worth a try. &#160; Link]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Samsung has just announced&nbsp;its new&nbsp;tiny DMB phone&nbsp;model number SCH-B360 / SPH-B3600 / SPH-B3650.</div>
<p align=center><img alt=2005_12_20small_samsung_dmb_tv_mobile.jpg src="/wp-content/2005_12_20small_samsung_dmb_tv_mobile.jpg"/></p>
<div>Everyday we&#8217;re getting closer to mobile TV applications. It&#8217;s still not clear to me how important our&nbsp;needs for&nbsp;real-time video streams on-the-move are. But TV was never mobile. It&#8217;s certainly worth a try.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><a href="http://www.i4u.com/article4773.html">Link</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.broadcasting20.org/2005/12/20/a-very-compact-dmb-receiver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

